Comparing the Cost of Repaying Mortgage Arrears in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Versus a Loan Modification

February 16, 2012 by  Filed under: Bankruptcy 

The economy is struggling to recover, unemployment is high, and as a result there are a lot of people who are behind on their mortgage payments and at risk of having their home foreclosed. To help people save their homes, mortgage companies and the federal government are touting the benefits of loan modifications and homeowners are buying into the idea of modifying their mortgage in record numbers. But before modifying a mortgage loan, homeowners should weigh the true cost of refinancing their mortgage and consider curing mortgage arrears in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case instead.

Loan modifications are often a long process. Many of my clients who apply for a loan modification, don’t receive a response until a year after the process began. After months of submitting documents, jumping through one hoop after another, they are often turned down for their loan modification and end up filing bankruptcy to save their home.

Modifications may involve closing costs which may or may not be rolled into the modified loan, further increasing the amount financed. In addition, once mortgage arrears are included in the new loan they begin to incur interest, so curing $10,000 in mortgage arrears could end up costing the debtor $30,000 or more over the life of the loan.

In some instances filing Chapter 13 bankruptcy may be a better alternative to a loan modification. In the Northern District of Texas, mortgage arrears repaid in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy are paid without interest, so the cost of curing mortgage arrears is often lower than it would be in a modified loan. Most homeowners are eligible for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and the process does not require a long application process.

To determine whether Chapter 13 bankruptcy or a modification is the best option, homeowners should take into account whether the loan modification simply cures the mortgage arrears or whether it actually lowers the interest rate. If it lowers the interest rate then a loan modification may be a better option than Chapter 13 bankruptcy because the cost of paying interest on the mortgage arrears cured in the loan modification may be offset by the savings gotten from the reduction in the interest rate. However, if the interest rate stays the same and the only benefit of refinancing the mortgage is curing the mortgage arrears, then the homeowner should consider whether Chapter 13 bankruptcy might be a better option.

Nathan S. Graham is an attorney with The Wright Firm, LLP. Nathan represents individuals and debtors in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases. The Wright Firm, LLP, has offices in Dallas, Denton, Lewisville, and Frisco.

For more information about Nathan Graham visit the Wright Firm’s web site at http://www.northtexas-bankruptcy.com or read Nathan’s blog at http://www.northtexas-bankruptcy.com/blog/.

Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Nathan_S_Graham

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


You must be logged in to post a comment.

Prev Post:
Next Post: